Get in Touch

Terms & Clarifications

All course materials, TCO models, and compliance checklists are provided for operational guidance only. Figures and benchmarks reflect typical commercial fleet conditions in the region and may vary by vehicle class, duty cycle, and local regulation. Contractual terms for B2B engagements are confirmed in writing before any programme begins.

Definitions apply to course scope No binding cost guarantees Regulatory references as of current year Client data stays confidential Programme access tied to enrolment

Operational Capabilities for Fleet Cost Control

Applied modules for maintenance budgeting, B2B contract alignment, resource consumption tracking, and technical compliance across commercial vehicle operations.

Commercial truck fleet parked in a logistics yard at dusk

Field Notes from Fleet Managers

What operators say after applying TCO models, maintenance schedules, and compliance checklists from our courses.

We rebuilt our maintenance calendar around the predictive analytics module. Engine hours and fault codes now drive the schedule, not guesswork. Downtime dropped by a third within two quarters, and the workshop finally works on a plan instead of putting out fires.

ბექა ჯაფარიძე — Fleet Operations Lead, Tbilisi

The TCO breakdown changed how we compare vehicles. Fuel, depreciation, and scheduled service were always on the spreadsheet, but the course forced us to include resale value and compliance costs. The difference between two shortlisted trucks was nearly 12% once everything was on the table.

ნინა გელაშვილი — Procurement Manager, Rustavi

Technical compliance used to be a paperwork burden. The checklist from the course turned it into a routine: documentation, inspections, driver training — all mapped to deadlines. We passed the annual audit without a single finding, and the team spends less time chasing certificates.

გიორგი მაისურაძე — Compliance Officer, Kutaisi

B2B subcontracts were the weak point in our cost structure. The negotiation framework helped us set clear service levels and penalty clauses. Our workshop partners now report costs in the same format we use, so comparing quotes takes hours instead of weeks.

თამარ ბერიძე — Logistics Controller, Batumi

Resource consumption tracking was scattered across three systems. The course gave us a single metric set for fuel, tyres, and lubricants. Monthly reviews are shorter, and anomalies surface before they turn into budget overruns.

ლევან ჩხეიძე — Depot Manager, Gori

I joined the course to fix our cost reporting, but the biggest win was the compliance module. We mapped every vehicle to its inspection cycle and emissions class. The fleet is now audit-ready at any moment, and the board sees the numbers in one place.

მარიამ კობახიძე — Finance Analyst, Telavi
Engagement sequence

From initial request to operational result

Step 01

Fleet audit and data intake

We collect vehicle records, maintenance logs, fuel consumption data and current contract terms. The audit defines the baseline for every cost figure we work with later.

Step 02

TCO model calibration

Each vehicle class gets its own cost structure: acquisition, depreciation, fuel, tyres, scheduled service and unscheduled repairs. We calibrate the model against your actual operational data, not industry averages.

Step 03

Process mapping and compliance check

We map your maintenance workflow, spare parts procurement and driver reporting lines against technical compliance requirements. Gaps in documentation or inspection schedules are flagged with a clear priority list.

Step 04

Cost reduction scenarios

Based on the calibrated model, we build three scenarios: maintenance rescheduling, supplier renegotiation and resource consumption controls. Each scenario shows expected savings and operational risk.

Step 05

Implementation support

We stay on site during the first two operating cycles. Our team helps your dispatchers and mechanics adopt the new schedules, reporting forms and approval workflows without disrupting daily operations.

Step 06

Result review and adjustment

After three months we compare actual spend against the model, review compliance status and adjust the parameters. You receive a final report with the measured effect and a roadmap for the next period.

Cookie settings

We use cookies to keep the site reliable, remember basic choices, and understand which pages are useful. You can accept, reject, or review the settings before continuing.

EN KA